requestId:68499ac303a808.95428077.
The Future of Confucian Ethics and Humanity
Author: Chen Shaoming
Source: Author Author Authorized Confucian Network, Originally published by Peng Pai News
Time: Confucius was in the 2570th year of the year, Xinmao
� p>
Peng Pai News Note: The war was issued on April 22. As one of the theme lectures on the Chinese Language and Culture Department, Chen Shaoming, a professor of the Chinese Language and Culture Department of Philosophy, gave a lecture on the topic at the Humanities Building of the Chinese Language and Culture Department, the Humanities Report Hall of the Chinese Language and Culture Department.
Chen Shaoming taught the development of high-tech as a landscape to explore the ability of humanitarian change in future society from the perspective of Confucian humanitarianism. During the lecture, Chen Cheng paid special attention to the moral dilemma brought by the two situations of external reproduction and prolonged life related to biological technology, and emphasized that this nursing is a problem faced by human cooperation. The lecture is run by Teacher Chen Yun, a teacher from Huadong Master Fan’s Department of Philosophy.
Chen Shaoming, a professor in the Department of Philosophy of Zhongshan
1. Confucian humanitarian discussion
The topic of “Confucian ethics and the future of humanity” originated from a discussion. One of the questions I thought about at that time was whether there were fixed and unchanging people’s standards, or what were the people we already thought? Is this setting certain and unquestionable? After this problem, I have a lot of thoughts and discussions after that.
The Confucian and future topics seem to be very time-traveling. Common Confucian principles understand that they are all about past knowledge or value, and even when they are exposed to the present, they are all full of debate. Secondly, whether it is a kind of knowledge in the future is also a problem. Because the most talked about the future in the past were either modern witches or current science fiction novels, and historians would also talk about the future. What philosophy wants to connect these two buy online ppt things, or maybe we can clarify some problems.
NoBaobao In fact, it is about caring about humans. Humans are questions that can be discussed. However, the object we are concerned about is Confucianism or the future. When discussing, we must clarify. Regarding Chinese philosophy, the questions discussed are often the relationship between heaven and man, one is In the day of discussion, one is a debater, two things can be combined into one or divided. The most basic point of discussing the whole question is humanitarianism. Of course, the real boss will not let this happen. While countering, we can understand it as a definition or specification of people, the ability of people to be and what kind of people to be Where did nature come from? On this basis, Confucianism also raised a different problem – what kind of humanity order should we set up? The Confucianism’s statement about this is to have love from the humanity to the nation’s righteousness.
As far as humanity is concerned, many people will think of it The human nature is good as Mencius said. The question that Mencius cared about was why people could be great people. This great person is not what power we have in meaning, but whether people as a person will adopt a concern for the same kind. If you are concerned, Mencius will think that this is a manifestation of goodness, on the contrary, it is evilBaobao.com comparison shows. If you only care about yourself, it is bad to harm others as the price.
Mencius stated that all of us have a tendency to care about others. Take an example, what is said to be a child who is going to fall into a well. In the case, anyone will feel anxious. In Mencius’s opinion, this tension and anxiety have nothing to do with you and whether you are with him or not. It is purely concerned about one’s life, and especially the child, which has a major meaning of double concern for young life. For this related problem, you are concerned not only by your own family, but by any one. Noble people. We are very familiar with this example. When the master thinks that people are good, he will think of Mencius’ example. But if Mencius did not submit this example, would he think of the problem of good? I don’t think of it. In fact, this is an example of a special choice, which eliminates many reasons. The one who cares about it is not adults, but children. Through this example, it is the least difficult to confess our kindness to others. The ability of life and life. From this development, Mencius turned it into a boundary that defines humans and non-humans. Why did Mencius define this? What he touched was his concern for the broader humanity and the future of human society. This concern was called the controversy between humans and birds in Confucian discussions, which is a unique view of Confucianism.
Mencius博所‘s statement is actually to explain why there is morality. He divides people and animals into a distinction, and puts the foundation of the behavior of morality in humanity, but it does not explain all human behavior.In order to use human moral thinking and behavior as the basis for the division between animals. Why? There is a very important problem. Humans actually develop from animals. Humans are animals that are unwilling to admit that they are animals. In fact, there are many reasons for our behavior. Confucianism does not understand this basic reason, but Mencius’ humanitarian theory does not want to explain that thing.
We found a supplementary word about Xunzi. How did Xunzi view humanity? He has a saying, “Water and fire have energy but no birth, plants and trees have birth but no knowledge, birds and animals have knowledge but no morals, people have energy, life and knowing and no morals, so it is the most expensive in the whole country.” He said that humans have more things that animals do not have, but they do not lose what animals have on humans. If you lose that, you will not be able to explain many behaviors of a person. In addition to morality, there are many behaviors that have nothing to do with morality. I want to use Xunzi’s positioning to see Confucianism’s basic understanding of human nature, which is the meaning of abandoning life. One is knowledge, the other is meaning. Identity is the problem of moral sense, knowledge is the most basic thing, and self-recognized talent. If a person does not have the ability to recognize and recognize himself, he will not be able to talk about other problems. If so, your moral behavior is not our moral behavior.
Regarding the humanitarianism issue, humanity is formed by a natural sense of civilization or a sense of nature. These are two differences of solutions. The East also has two differences, and the most aspiring thinkers and politicians who emphasize the importance of civilization. They are ambitious to reform humanity; if not, they are more willing to guide humanity from what is inherent in humanity. This is the direction of the two differences.
Chen Shaoming’s lecture scene on “Confucian ethics and the future of humanity”.
2. In front of artificial intelligence and biotechnology
Why discuss the humanitarian future? That’s because of the problem caused by technological reactions. However, the problems caused by technological reactions are incompletely related to our problems, as long as the department is related. We all understand that the widespread discussion of the impact of technological reactions on humans has been compared to the past few years. The most prominent example is the emergence of robots that play chess and win humans – AlphaGo. It only after AlphaGo appeared that we were so excited. In fact, machine chess and wins are notFor the first time, in the 1970s and 1980s, there were already machines winning players. At that time, they played international chess, which defeated the international chess world champion. But the various discussions I saw at that time seemed to be bad because there was no way to play chess, so chess was definitely not allowed. But we never expected that this job would appear twenty or thirty years later. The problem of winning people under the machine is the problem of artificial intelligence we talk about. We will also mention humanity, but the problem I want to discuss is different. When we discuss artificial intelligence, we are worried about whether the machine will become a human being, whether the machine will be humane, which includes the bad reasons in humanity. And the humanitarian future problem we want to talk about is not this problem. What I want to say is whether people will become machines? Will your nature be changed?
There are two major aspects that affect humanitarian structure. One is the
發佈留言